False Advertising

Sephora Faces Class Action over Nutrafol: Damages Sought

Updated on
Published on
Sephora Faces Class Action over Nutrafol: Damages Sought

In the world of beauty and personal care, Sephora USA, Inc. is a household name. However, this titan of the industry is currently facing a class-action lawsuit filed by Andrew Jones, a California citizen representing others similarly affected. The complaint centers around Sephora's hair growth supplement, Nutrafol, which is sold at a premium price of around $90 per month.

The crux of the lawsuit lies in the alleged false advertising practices employed by Sephora. The company is accused of making misleading representations about Nutrafol's contents and benefits. According to the complaint, Sephora claimed that Nutrafol is "clinically proven," "clinically tested," "physician-formulated," and "standardized." However, Jones alleges that these claims are far from the truth.


Jones's allegations stem from tests conducted on Nutrafol samples from different lots, which reportedly revealed inconsistent and underfilled quantities of key ingredients like Vitamin A, Biotin, and Vitamin E. Furthermore, the lawsuit alleges that Sephora failed to disclose the presence of measurable amounts of Arsenic in the product.


These allegations, if proven true, could have serious implications under the Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) and the Unfair Competition Law (UCL). Both of these laws are designed to protect consumers from deceptive business practices, including false advertising. Under the CLRA, consumers can seek damages for any harm caused by a company's deceptive practices, while the UCL allows for injunctions and restitution.


Jones's complaint also alleges a breach of express and implied warranty. Under California law, express warranties are created when a seller makes specific promises or affirmations about a product. If these promises turn out to be false, the seller can be held liable for breach of express warranty. Similarly, an implied warranty of merchantability guarantees that a product is fit for its ordinary purpose. If Nutrafol is indeed not standardized and contains inconsistent amounts of key ingredients, Sephora could potentially be in violation of this warranty.


The lawsuit further accuses Sephora of negligent misrepresentation, which involves supplying false information about a product's nature, quality, and properties. Jones claims to have relied on Sephora's alleged misrepresentations when purchasing Nutrafol, and asserts that he would not have bought the product or would have paid less for it had he known the truth.


In addition to these allegations, Jones accuses Sephora of unjust enrichment. This legal concept applies when one party benefits at the expense of another in a way that is considered unjust. Jones alleges that Sephora profited from a fraudulent marketing scheme, selling Nutrafol at a premium price while failing to deliver on the product's promised benefits.


In terms of damages, Jones is seeking compensatory damages, punitive damages, and restitution for the economic harm he claims to have suffered as a result of Sephora's alleged deceptive practices. He is also seeking pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, as well as reasonable attorneys' fees and costs.


This lawsuit serves as a stark reminder of the importance of truth in advertising, especially in an industry where consumers often rely on product claims to make purchasing decisions. As this case unfolds, it will be interesting to see how the courts interpret and apply the relevant laws, and what implications this might have for Sephora and the broader beauty and personal care industry.

Case Facts

  • Status:
    Lawsuit Filed
  • Case Number:
    23CV041205
  • Filing Date:
    August 22, 2023
  • Jurisdiction:
    Alameda County Superior Courts
  • State:
    California
  • Court:
    Rene C Davidson Courthouse
  • Plaintiff:
    Andrew Jones
  • Defendant:
    Sephora USA, Inc.
  • Plaintiff Firm:
    Michael McShane
  • Defendant Firm:
  • Claims Administrator:
Contributors
Jerome Andries, Esq.
Jerome Andries, Esq.
Reporter and Licensed Attorney
Weekly newsletter

Stay up to date with new class action settlements you may join.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Complaint

This browser does not support inline PDFs. Please download the PDF to view it: Download PDF

Related class action lawsuits

Read more to get notified about updates to each case.

Beliv LLC Faces Class Action Over Misleading Fruit Nectar Labels
False Advertising

Beliv LLC Faces Class Action Over Misleading Fruit Nectar Labels

Lawsuit alleges Beliv LLC's Petit Nectar 'strawberry banana' product misleadingly labeled, violating Florida's consumer protection laws.
Caesars Sportsbook Faces Class Action over 'Risk-Free' Bets
False Advertising

Caesars Sportsbook Faces Class Action over 'Risk-Free' Bets

Lawsuit alleges Caesars Sportsbook misled customers with 'free bet' and 'risk-free' bet offers, violating consumer protection laws.
I-Health Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged False Claims, Plaintiffs Seek Damages
False Advertising

I-Health Faces Lawsuit Over Alleged False Claims, Plaintiffs Seek Damages

Lawsuit alleges I-Health falsely labeled its Culturelle Ultimate Balance for Antibiotics products, violating FDA and California consumer protection laws.
Reynolds Wrap Faces Lawsuit Over 'Made in U.S.A.' Claims
False Advertising

Reynolds Wrap Faces Lawsuit Over 'Made in U.S.A.' Claims

Lawsuit alleges Reynolds Wrap's 'Made in U.S.A.' claim is deceptive, violating California's consumer protection laws and misleading consumers.
Sephora Faces Class Action over Nutrafol: Damages Sought
False Advertising

Sephora Faces Class Action over Nutrafol: Damages Sought

Sephora is facing a class action lawsuit over its Nutrafol product. The lawsuit alleges false advertising, violation of consumer laws, and seeks damages.
Apple iCloud Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Alleged Storage Misrepresentation
False Advertising

Apple iCloud Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Alleged Storage Misrepresentation

Apple Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit alleging that it misrepresented the storage capacity of its iCloud service, violating California's consumer protection laws.
UFC Faces Class Action over Fight Pass Subscriptions
False Advertising

UFC Faces Class Action over Fight Pass Subscriptions

UFC is facing a class action lawsuit over allegations of violating California's Automatic Renewal Law with its Fight Pass subscriptions.
Dyson Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Alleged Warranty Violations
False Advertising

Dyson Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Alleged Warranty Violations

Dyson, Inc. is facing a class action lawsuit alleging violations of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act and deceptive practices.
Lyft & Grubhub Face $5 Million Lawsuit Over Deceptive Practices
False Advertising

Lyft & Grubhub Face $5 Million Lawsuit Over Deceptive Practices

Lawsuit alleges Lyft and Grubhub engaged in deceptive practices, misrepresenting fees, prices, and services, violating New York laws, and seeking at least $5 million in damages.
1-800-Flowers Faces Class Action for Auto-Renewal Violations
False Advertising

1-800-Flowers Faces Class Action for Auto-Renewal Violations

Lawsuit alleges 800-Flowers, Inc. violated California's UCL and FAL by failing to obtain consent for automatic renewal terms, causing damages.
Chobani Zero Sugar Lawsuit: Seeking Damages for Deceptive Claims
False Advertising

Chobani Zero Sugar Lawsuit: Seeking Damages for Deceptive Claims

Lawsuit alleges Chobani falsely advertised "zero sugar" products, violating Illinois Consumer Fraud Act and California's UCL & FAL; seeks restitution.